Watchmen (2009)

Director:  Zack Snyder 

Cast:  Jackie Earle Haley, Patrick Wilson, Carla Gugino, Billy Crudup, Matthew Goode
When an ex-superhero is murdered, a vigilante named Rorschach begins an investigation into the murder, which begins to lead to a much more terrifying conclusion.

Genre:  Action / Mystery / Sci-Fi
Awards:  -

Runtime:  162min
Rating:  R21
for strong graphic violence, sexuality, nudity and language.  

Watchmen is the first official Hollywood blockbuster to hit the theaters.  The timing is unusual because March is generally an infertile period for the release of major blockbusters. The screen adaptation of Alan Moore’s landmark graphic novel of the same name had been in the pipeline for nearly two decades.  It is finally envisioned by Zack Snyder, after being rejected by leading directors Darren Aronofsky, Paul Greengrass and Terry Gilliam amongst others. 

After the mega succe
ss of the swords-and-sandals epic 300, selecting Snyder to helm Watchmen was initially a very tantalizing choice.  Well, that is until you have watched the actual film.  Watchmen is 2009’s first (but definitely not last) colossal disappointment for a blockbuster that is so highly-anticipated.  Critics are divided over the film and I happen to be part of the unforgiving half.  On a more positive note, Snyder’s vision of Watchmen is faithful to its source material.  This will please most hard-core fans whose patience is duly rewarded. 

For the rest of us who are constantly scratching our heads during the film, it is extremely difficult to immerse oneself into the universe of Watchmen without prior knowledge or insight.  Not that being armed with the prerequisites will allow one to enjoy the film much more.  Watchmen has a frustrating narrative structure that is an incoherent synthesis of poorly-paced sequences and ill-timed flashbacks. 

With the exception of Rorschach (who is brilliantly realized by Oscar-nominated Jackie Earl Haley), the other superhero characters appear as paper-thin portrayals of their novelized version.  Furthermore, their costume and makeup is at best, amateurish.  I do not see a band of genuine heroes but rather, a group of young adults attempting to live out their 'Watchmen' fantasies on screen. 

The visual eff
ects are average, sometimes even weirdly laughable, especially scenes of Dr. Manhattan with his exposed penis in desolate Mars conjuring up what seems like an enormous mechanical set of spinning gears and shafts in a bid to build his dream domicile. Slow-motion CGI action is a hallmark of Snyder, but it does not work well in a film that is already unnecessarily lengthy and abysmally-paced. 

Filmmakers mu
st understand that great films are mostly loosely adapted from its source; more focus is channeled to direction, editing, acting, and finally the need to entertain audiences.  Zack Snyder showed that understanding in 300, but apparently lost it when making Watchmen.  In an attempt to satisfy critical fans, Snyder has alienated the rest. Being loyal to one’s spouse is not enough; there is still that intrinsic need to entertain him or her.  Watchmen will be a cult favorite, but it is unabsorbing and pretentious filmmaking.

GRADE: F (4/10 or 1.5 stars)

Click here to go back to Central Station.




noobie said…
you really need to understand that it was a perfect adaptation of the graphic novel. it was rejected by so many directors because it has a very strong and difficult material to adapt to. but under Snyder, he really did a marvelous job. the characters are meant to be paper thinned. i generally enjoy your reviews but for people who disliked Watchmen, it's because they have sky high expectations and have no idea what the graphic novel is all about. you gave a much higher rating to The Spirit, now that's a real abomination.
Eternality said…
Honestly, I enjoyed The Spirit far more than Watchmen, even though I have NOT read both graphic novels. So I am mostly judging from the film perspective. Thanks for writing anyway.

Popular Posts