THE SCOOP Director: John Lasseter
Plot: Star race car Lightning McQueen and his pal Mater head overseas to compete in the World Grand Prix race. But the road to the championship becomes rocky as Mater gets caught up in an intriguing adventure of his own: international espionage.
Genre: Animation/Adventure/Comedy
Awards: Nom. for 1 Golden Globe - best animated feature.
Runtime: 106min
Rating: G
TRAILER:
OST:
IN RETROSPECT
John Lasseter's Cars 2 is not as disappointing as expected, though together with its prequel, Cars (2006), they represent the weakest points in Pixar's admired filmography over the last fifteen years. I find it curious that Lasseter would want to make a sequel to, of all Pixar films, Cars, a film that despite its fresh and perky concept at the time, remains to be seen trying too hard to impress, while at the same time lacking in the kind of critical appeal that had been lavished on every other Pixar feature in the past. Still, expect an Oscar nomination for Best Animated Feature for the film, but no guaranteed win this time.
That being said, Cars 2 is actually a quite entertaining
film, though I suspect for Pixar that is the minimum prerequisite. The plot is
straightforward, focusing on the relationship between Lightning McQueen (Owen
Wilson), the race car, and Mater (Larry the Cable Guy), the rusty tow
truck. A new adventure is in stored for
them as they travel halfway around the world to Japan, where the first (out of
three) World Grand Prix race is held. However, there seems to be a conspiracy
brewing behind-the-scenes regarding a new fuel called Allinol, with Mater
unintentionally getting sucked into the whirlwind world of spy action.
The animation is
very realistic and colourful, though the movements of the car characters as
they speed, fly, and jump from one place to another seem to bend the laws of
physics too much. Perhaps this is what makes viewers take the film less
seriously, and thus investing less emotional interest in the characters. Unlike
the toys in the Toy Story trilogy (1995,
1999, 2010), or the talking robots in Wall-E
(2008), both of which have humanized features and adhere to some form of
physical logic, cars are difficult to see as humanized as they are known to men
for more than a century now as mechanized tools.
One wonders how much effort was put into the
animation component of the film, because the end result is stunning, which is
thankful because that is probably the film’s biggest strength. Lasseter’s film
is inspired by a host of films that make up the subgenre of spy movies, most
notably James Bond flicks. One scene in which a car transforms into a
mini-submarine is reminiscent of a similar scene in The Spy Who Loved Me (1977). Other scenes see cars trying to
wriggle their way out of tight situations as the time bomb ticks. It may all
look strange to the human eye, but Cars 2
is at the very least a decent family movie that is sprinkled with bots of
humour throughout. Kudos to Mater for that.
GRADE: B (7.5/10 or 3.5 stars)
Click here to go back to Central Station.


0 comments:
Post a Comment