Looper (2012)






THE SCOOP
Director:  Rian Johnson
Cast:  Joseph Gordon-LevittBruce Willis, Emily Blunt, Paul Dano, Pierce Gagnon.
Plot:  In 2074, when the mob wants to get rid of someone, the target is sent 30 years into the past, where a hired gun awaits. Someone like Joe, who one day learns the mob wants to 'close the loop' by transporting back Joe's future self.

Genre:  Action / Sci-Fi / Thriller

Awards:  -
Runtime:  118min
Rating:  NC16 for strong violence, language, some sexuality/nudity and drug content.

IN RETROSPECT (Spoilers: NO)
This time travel crap, just fries your brain like a egg...

I always look forward to sci-fi films that are more intelligent than their audience. Looper is that rare entry to the genre that will befuddle mainstream viewers, but give more serious folks a good mental workout.

Rian Johnson, who previously helmed the mystery-drama Brick (2005), now intrigues viewers with a premise rooted in the most mind-twisting of sci-fi concepts - time travel. It is an original screenplay, written and directed by Johnson himself, but it heavily references films that came before it that made their mark in the genre.

The joy of watching Looper comes not only from gleefully identifying these overt references (Dark City, 1998; Terminator 2: Judgment Day, 1991, Minority Report, 2002, anyone?), but how these references together constitute a unique kind of cinematic experience. It is like Quentin Tarantino doing a sci-fi movie, only with much less dialogue.

Still, don’t be deceived as Looper is not an all out entertaining (and philosophical) film like The Matrix (1999), but a more quiet dramatic film punctuated with sci-fi action and violence.

It is a world brilliantly realized by Johnson on a tight budget of US$30 mil. His handling of tone and cinematography is outstanding, as his sporadic use of visual effects. The climactic act is a tour de force, though I must admit that its epilogue lacks punch.

What I find most fascinating about Looper is that Johnson has made a film of two halves of distinctive visual style and tone. The first half works like a dark and twisted sci-fi film before it transits via a quite bizarre 'timeline' sequence into a suburban drama with mystery overtones.

Notice that I haven't really talk about the plot. I do not even want to begin as Johnson is a much better storyteller. So if you like to pay ten bucks to perform mental gymnastics, I recommend you to go ahead. There are surprisingly few conceptual flaws (other than the basic loopholes that are the hallmark of all time-travel movies), so this should work out satisfyingly in some way or another.

The performances by Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Bruce Willis, and Emily Blunt are half-decent. A kid named Cid (Pierce Gagnon) who plays the anchoring point of the entire plot, but who only appears in the second half of the film steals the show, channelling maturity, empathy and anger in equal measure.

Looper is a smart, assured, and mind-wrecking film that deserves multiple viewings. It is also quite creepy. If anyone dares to remake Kubrick's The Shining (1980), he or she should probably know which kid to cast as Danny Torrance.

Verdict:  This stylish time travel sci-fi action drama is a treat for serious film enthusiasts who are also mental gymnasts. 

GRADE: B+ (8/10 or 3.5 stars)







Click here to go back to Central Station.

























TRAILER:


OST:

Comments

dtmmr.com said…
Good review. The plot makes perfect sense even if it may seem a bit confusing at first, and the suspense draws you in but something just did not mix so well in the end. I didn’t really care all that much for the characters and that’s sort of why the pay-off didn’t do much for me.
Eternality said…
Thanks Dan. Was shuffling back and forth between a 8/10 and 8.5/10 rating. Agree with you that the payoff was problematic, but I have to say that the film was unpredictable till the end.

By the way, have bookmarked your website. Keep the awesome reviews coming! =)

Popular Posts